The death of 65 Nigerians, including children, in stampedes during food distribution events across the country within a single week represents more than just a series of tragic accidents.
These incidents, occurring in Ibadan, Abuja, and Anambra, paint a devastating picture of a nation where citizens are literally dying to receive basic sustenance. That such tragedies are unfolding during what should be a festive Christmas season makes them even more heart-wrenching and demands urgent national introspection.
The immediate trigger for these deadly stampedes may be poor crowd control and inadequate planning, as retired Commissioner of Police Lawrence Alobi correctly points out. However, the underlying cause is far more sinister: widespread hunger and economic desperation that have driven citizens to risk their lives for a cup of rice. When people are willing to die in crowds just to receive basic food items, we must acknowledge that we are witnessing not just an organisational failure, but a profound societal breakdown.
The sequence of events is particularly disturbing. First, 35 children lost their lives during a Christmas funfair stampede in Ibadan. Before the nation could process this tragedy, another 10 people, including four children, died at the Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Maitama, Abuja. On the same day, 20 more lives were lost in Anambra during a food distribution exercise. These are not mere statistics; they represent families shattered, dreams extinguished, and communities traumatised during what should have been a season of joy.
The response from authorities has been predictably bureaucratic. The Police High Command has issued new guidelines requiring prior notification for palliative distribution events. The FCT Minister , Nyesom Wike and Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo- Olu have mandated official approvals for such gatherings. While these measures may help prevent future stampedes, they do nothing to address the fundamental question: Why are so many Nigerians desperate enough to risk death for basic foodstuffs?
President Bola Tinubu’s cancellation of his Lagos Boat Regatta appearance in honor of the victims, while commendable as a gesture, highlights the stark contrast between the lifestyle of the political class and the grinding poverty faced by ordinary citizens.
In the considered opinion of this newspaper, the spectacle of a president canceling a luxury boat parade because citizens died scrambling for food aid is a painful metaphor for Nigeria’s inequality. It underscores the disconnection between those who govern and those who struggle daily for survival.
These tragedies bear an eerie resemblance to the 2014 Immigration Service recruitment tragedy, where seven people died and 40 were injured during a job test in Abuja. The common thread in these incidents is clear: desperate citizens risking their lives for basic opportunities that should be readily available in a well-functioning society. That we are still witnessing such incidents a decade later shows how little progress we have made in addressing the underlying issues of poverty, unemployment, and social inequality.
The Civil Society Organisations are right to decry these deaths as symptoms of a worsening hunger crisis. However, we must go further. These tragedies represent the complete failure of governance at all levels. They reflect a systemic inability to provide basic economic security and dignity to the population. The fact that private individuals and religious organisations are now trying to fill this gap through charitable distributions – with tragic consequences – only highlights the state’s abdication of its responsibilities.
In our view, the solution cannot lie merely in better-organised charity events or more stringent crowd control measures. While these are necessary, they treat only the symptoms. What Nigeria needs is a fundamental overhaul of its economic management and social security systems.
The government must prioritise policies that create sustainable employment, control inflation, and ensure food security. The current situation where citizens depend on sporadic charitable distributions for survival is unsustainable and, as we have seen, deadly.
Furthermore, there must be accountability at multiple levels. Organisations conducting food distribution events should indeed face consequences for negligent planning that results in deaths.
The enforcement of Sections 196 of the Penal Code and 344 of the Criminal Code regarding public safety during such events is important, but it should extend to holding public officials responsible for the conditions that necessitate these risky charitable distributions in the first place.
The directive for government hospitals to treat the injured free of charge, while necessary, is another band-aid solution that fails to address the core issues. A country where citizens must rely on emergency directives to receive basic medical care after dying in food queues has lost its way. We need systematic reform of our social safety nets, not ad hoc responses to tragedies.
As we mourn these needless deaths, we must recognise them for what they are – not merely unfortunate accidents, but the predictable outcome of failed governance. No Nigerian should have to die seeking basic sustenance. Until we address the root causes of this desperation, we risk seeing more such tragedies, regardless of how many guidelines and protocols we put in place.
